Opposite to what you may consider, you are not truly residing within the 21st Century. As a substitute, you are within the 1700s, and the rationale that the majority of you do not acknowledge this truth is that the elites of the early medieval interval labored exhausting to deceive you. No less than, that is what German historian Herbert Illig places ahead in his phantom time speculation.

“There’s this outrageous declare that each one historians have made a mistake and that we have all had the wool pulled over our eyes and that the chronology all of us observe at this time is fallacious,” explains David Hamon, an unbiased researcher who has studied different histories.

What Is the Phantom Time Speculation?

The phantom time speculation goes one thing like this: The Holy Roman Emperor Otto III conspired with Pope Sylvester II (and fairly presumably the Byzantine Emperor Constantine VII as effectively) to physician the relationship system. The trio cooked the books to put their reigns at A.D. 1000, which they did as a result of it’s an auspicious quantity.

The three males added 297 years of bogus historical past to the early medieval interval to facilitate this deception. That might imply every thing that occurred between A.D. 614-911 was a fabrication — no Charlemagne, no Muslim conquest of Spain and no Viking raids on England.

Illig maintains that the three rulers tinkered with paperwork on the time, made up historic occasions (reminiscent of Charlemagne), planted pretend proof to be dug up centuries later, and commanded their underlings to again them up. The proof, cited by Illig, is a scarcity of unique historic paperwork from the time interval – also referred to as the Darkish Ages in Europe — and alleged discrepancies between the Julian and Gregorian calendars.

Learn Extra: 3 Historic Hoaxes That Duped The Masses, Scientists Or Media

Debunking the Phantom Time Conspiracy

Do any of those claims maintain up towards scrutiny? “Every part critical I’ve ever learn in regards to the phantom time speculation says it is all garbage,” says Hamon. “These claims actually cannot be supported. Illig is simply stirring the pot, and right here we’re discussing it, so I suppose he is doing effectively there. However nobody has any critical proof for this.”

A Euro-centric View

The truth is, there is no scarcity of convincing proof to contradict Illig’s concept. First up, the speculation is extremely Euro-centric. If it had been true, there would even be 300 years of lacking historical past worldwide, which might be evident from historic paperwork throughout Africa, Asia, Australasia, and the Americas.

The truth that these cultures’ timelines match these of Western cultures implies that Illig’s concept is both incorrect or, alternatively, the elites all over the world one way or the other colluded with the Europeans to cowl up the misplaced time. That, we are able to all agree, is exceedingly unlikely.

Astronomical Proof

Subsequent up is the astronomical proof. We’ve proof of photo voltaic eclipses and different celestial occasions in paperwork that predate the lacking time interval.

If the phantom time speculation was true, it will have distorted the chronology, and these occasions would not match up with our mathematical understanding of how the universe works. The traditional Romans, for instance, recorded a photo voltaic eclipse in A.D. 59, and fashionable astronomers have since confirmed this date as correct.

Archaeological Proof

There are additionally archaeological stays that correspond with the written sources, and eventually, relationship strategies reminiscent of tree rings and radiocarbon methods do not match up with Illig’s claims.

None of that is to say that the phantom time speculation does not matter, although, as a result of it has affect past those that consider in it, says Hamon.

Learn Extra: Why People Become Overwhelmed by Conspiracy Theories — and How To Help Them

Are Conspiracy Theories Dangerous?

“When folks look to query the timeline and are pressured to query whether or not the phantom time speculation might be true, it could possibly ignite a cascade of questions. If the standard timeline is fallacious, then what else is fallacious,” he says.

It is a query of moderation, says Hamon. It may be useful to query every thing and return to first rules, as long as we do not get carried away. “Normal skepticism can [be] wholesome if it is utilized with the understanding that we’re making an attempt to work out the reality. I do suppose it is wholesome to query our assumptions, but when your goal is to control, then that may be harmful,” says Hamon. “The place does the phantom time speculation slot in? I might say it is kind of innocent.”

Learn Extra: Fact or Fiction: What Is The Truth Behind Alien Conspiracy Theories?